Is Your Car Costing You More? The Hidden Truth About Fuel Economy

Every time you fill up your tank, you might be paying more than you think. A landmark study from the Australian Automobile Association (AAA) has exposed a massive gap between a car's advertised fuel economy and its actual performance on the road.

Are you tired of feeling like your car's fuel economy never lives up to the manufacturer's claims? A new independent study by the Australian Automobile Association (AAA) confirms that you're not alone.

The AAA's testing, which compared on-road driving results with official lab-tested figures for 30 of Australia's best-selling vehicles, revealed a shocking truth: most popular cars use significantly more fuel in real-world conditions. In some cases, the difference was up to a staggering 33% more fuel than what's stated on the official sticker.

Out of the 30 vehicles tested, only five matched or beat their official claims. This highlights a significant discrepancy between controlled laboratory testing and the realities of everyday driving, which includes factors like traffic, varying speeds, and driver behavior.

So, which cars performed the worst, and which ones actually saved you money at the pump? Let's take a closer look at some of the results:

The Biggest Discrepancies (Using More Fuel)

  • Hyundai Kona Hybrid: This car showed the largest difference, using a massive 33% more fuel in real-world driving than its lab result of 3.9 L/100km.
  • Kia Stonic: Drivers of this model can expect to use 26% more fuel than the claimed 5.4 L/100km.
  • Hyundai i30 Hybrid: Coming in with a 17% difference, this model's real-world fuel consumption was notably higher than its lab figure of 3.9 L/100km.
  • Toyota Fortuner: This popular SUV used 16% more fuel than its advertised 7.6 L/100km.

Models with Better-than-Claimed Fuel Economy

Not all cars underperformed. The AAA's study also identified some models that were more fuel-efficient on the road than in the lab. These are the cars that will truly save you money:

  • Ford Transit Custom: This vehicle's real-world fuel use was a remarkable 9% less than its lab result of 8.0 L/100km.
  • Lexus NX350h: Drivers of this hybrid will be pleased to know it used 7% less fuel than the claimed 5.0 L/100km.
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB 200: This car beat its official claim by a small but significant 1%.
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA: The GLA also slightly outperformed its lab result, using 2% less fuel on the road.

What Does This Mean for You?

The AAA's findings underscore the importance of looking beyond the official fuel consumption figures. While lab results provide a standardized benchmark, they don't always translate to real-world performance.

Before you make your next car purchase, consider that the official fuel consumption sticker may be more of a guide than a guarantee. Factors like your driving habits, typical road conditions, and even the vehicle's maintenance can all impact your actual fuel costs. This study serves as a crucial reminder to do your research and be prepared for potential discrepancies between what's advertised and what you'll actually pay at the pump.

To explore how these fuel costs might impact your budget or for advice on choosing a more efficient vehicle, get in touch with our team today here.

Want a no-fuss finance loan?

We make finance simple, breaking it down step-by-step so you feel more confident about your financial decisions.

Apply now